Maliki's Shameful Attacks on Sunnis, and Sadaam's Attacks on Shiites
November 5, 2011 by Bruce Wallace 121Contact
We don't disagree with the New York Times editorial of Nov. 5, 2011 titled, "The Prime Minister and the Sunnis"
We do, however note that the sentence, "The majority Shiites were badly persecuted under Saddam Hussein’s Sunni-led regime" oversimplifies a complex situation, and marks history from an arbitrary and biased point.
Sadaam's greatest travesties against the Shiite population were not against 'the majority Shiia', but were focused attacks on particular groups of Shiia that he perceived as specific enemies of his government. In both the North and the South of Iraq there were groups of Shiia that were aiding the Iranians in the Iraq/Iran war. Sadaam sought to punish these groups with sadistic, broad attacks that killed many innocent people along with his perceived enemies, but they were not random aggressions motivated by religious concerns. We don't condone these attacks. They were a brutal part of his most brutal years in power. We do, however, wish to put them in a broader historical context.
On the other hand, Maliki's recent roundups of Sunnis, especially in Mosul and Baghdad, seem to target random groups based solely upon their religious beliefs. The perception of sectarian oppression is once again becoming widespread and this elevates the spectre of sectarian violence to levels unseen in years. Maliki also effectively banned Mosul's non-violent civil protests against these detentions by imposing a curfew the night before the planned events.
We call on Maliki to free those recently arrested without charges, allow non-violent civil demonstrations, and move a little closer to the Rule of Law which holds so much promise for the Iraqi people.
Comments